‘Punitive retirees tax’ battle heats up between government, opposition

‘Punitive retirees tax’ battle heats up between government, opposition

In March last year, the federal opposition announced plans to remove cash refunds for excess dividend imputation credits.

In the 10 months since, the policy has had substantial backlash from the tax community.

The policy intent – to prevent tax concessions being directed towards the wealthier end of the population – is not a source of contention. Instead, there are concerns that the policy outcome will be the exact opposite – that those at the modest and low-income end of the scale will be adversely impacted. You can read more about this modelling in brief here, and extensively here.

Both Mr Frydenberg and Mr Bowen are using this as a key election issue, and arguing about the policy over Twitter.

Yesterday, Mr Frydenberg labelled the policy “savage” and one that will distort market behaviour, and issued a fiery public statement.

Mr Bowen fired back, accusing Mr Frydenberg of skating over Labor’s modelling.

“Given the policy has been costed by the Parliamentary Budget Office (which factors in behavioural change) and that the Treasury costing was close to the PBO over the forward estimates, are you now saying that both the PBO and Treasury are wrong? That’s an interesting development,” he said.

This will continue to play out publicly until the federal election.

Original article published on AccountantsDaily.